It’s a cliché now to say that Justin Trudeau, his agenda or his government are being «tested.» There have been any number of great «tests» over the last five years. But the test it faces now might be new — a test of whether he can soothe Canadians’ anxiety when they have abundant reasons to be anxious and the threats are not easily contained.

The opposition parties are eager to establish that the Trudeau government might share some kind of blame for whatever is about to happen.

In question period, the Conservatives were determined to argue that the Trudeau government had put Canada in a bad spot long before COVID-19 began to spread — that «six years of eroding Canada’s economic foundation» had left this country «weak and vulnerable.» They also poked and prodded the government’s outbreak response — vaguely suggesting that Canada’s borders should be tighter or that coordination with the provinces should be smoother.

For their part, the NDP alleged that provincial health care systems have suffered from «cuts» in federal funding — federal transfers have increased in each of the last four years, but New Democrats argue the rate of the increase should have been higher.

The Liberals have counter-arguments to such charges, but Monday’s questions and critiques underline the political risks of this moment.

How much elbow room does Morneau have?

On the federal budget, in particular, the Liberals still have room to spend, at least technically. According to the parliamentary budget officer, the Trudeau government could increase the current annual deficit by another $41 billion before federal finances would be fiscally unsustainable.

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Morneau was adamant that the federal government is in a «strong» fiscal position.

But a deficit might become a real political liability long before it hits the point where it’s fiscally unsustainable.

The most recent point of comparison for the current moment could end up being the Great Recession of 2008 and 2009. But as difficult as the global banking crisis was, a global health emergency might be something else entirely.

One important difference is already apparent. In 2008, the American government’s response managed to limit the damage. In 2020, the American government’s response seems to be making the situation worse. For at least as long as Donald Trump is president, the Trudeau government cannot take for granted that the United States will be a predictable or reliable actor, particularly at times of global unrest.

The Harper government’s approach to crisis

Stephen Harper famously fumbled his government’s initial response to the Great Recession — and nearly lost his government in the process.

Given a month to recalibrate, Harper’s Conservatives came back with «Canada’s Economic Action Plan» — a plan to spend billions of dollars building and doing things, and then to spend millions advertising what was being built and done.

The exact degree to which the fiscal stimulus worked to enhance the Canadian economy can be debated. But the success of the marketing effort is unquestionable — Canadians were assured there was a plan and that action was being taken. Harper successfully held himself up as a source of stability in the election that followed, in contrast with the supposed instability of an opposition coalition.

Millions in ad spending wouldn’t have worked in the absence of an articulated plan, and if the economy hadn’t seem to recover well. But the lesson still seems to be that crisis leadership is nearly as much about communication as it is about policy and governance.

For Trudeau in this moment, there is the added challenge of opposition claims that his leadership is «weak.» The Liberals also have vowed to not engage in the sort of self-promotion that the Harper government indulged in.

But Morneau’s appearance on Monday seemed designed to offer reassurance.

The finance minister assured Canadians that they had a strong health system and a strong balance sheet. He said the government’s efforts would be focused on supporting the health care system and those businesses and individuals affected. New measures, he said, would be announced later this week.

Asked about the possibility of a recession or stimulus spending, Morneau hedged.

«What we do will be very much about the facts,» he said. «We’re going to look at the facts of the situation to determine the right response.»

It’s usually a good idea to avoid getting ahead of yourself — particularly when you’re responsible for managing a G7 economy.

But the facts don’t seem likely to become comforting anytime soon.